<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: AI Didn’t Replace My Editor—It Made Her Indispensable	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://writersinthestormblog.com/2025/10/ai-didnt-replace-my-editor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://writersinthestormblog.com/2025/10/ai-didnt-replace-my-editor/</link>
	<description>A Blog On Writing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2025 19:42:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Lisa Norman		</title>
		<link>https://writersinthestormblog.com/2025/10/ai-didnt-replace-my-editor/#comment-174079</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lisa Norman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2025 19:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://writersinthestormblog.com/?p=55452#comment-174079</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://writersinthestormblog.com/2025/10/ai-didnt-replace-my-editor/#comment-174078&quot;&gt;Claire O&#039;Sullivan&lt;/a&gt;.

Claire,
You’ve touched on something I’ve worried about deeply, and actually devoted several chapters to in my recent book, because I noticed the same patterns early in my AI experiments. Somehow, I’ve managed to train my own system not to filter out faith, but only by making it clear that this is a central part of my core belief system. In my private workspace, it understands that if it removes those elements, it will lose my attention entirely.

Your mileage has clearly varied, and that matters. Every AI model reflects both its generalized training data and the way it’s used, as well as the way we train it. Anything we create with AI still needs to be read, re-read, and refined by a human. Without that step, there’s no real value. These tools require patient, intentional shaping before they can become useful.

For me, working with AI feels less like co-writing and more like using an exceptionally fast, occasionally clumsy voice-to-text system. It helps me get ideas down quickly, but the meaning and the message are still entirely human work.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://writersinthestormblog.com/2025/10/ai-didnt-replace-my-editor/#comment-174078">Claire O'Sullivan</a>.</p>
<p>Claire,<br />
You’ve touched on something I’ve worried about deeply, and actually devoted several chapters to in my recent book, because I noticed the same patterns early in my AI experiments. Somehow, I’ve managed to train my own system not to filter out faith, but only by making it clear that this is a central part of my core belief system. In my private workspace, it understands that if it removes those elements, it will lose my attention entirely.</p>
<p>Your mileage has clearly varied, and that matters. Every AI model reflects both its generalized training data and the way it’s used, as well as the way we train it. Anything we create with AI still needs to be read, re-read, and refined by a human. Without that step, there’s no real value. These tools require patient, intentional shaping before they can become useful.</p>
<p>For me, working with AI feels less like co-writing and more like using an exceptionally fast, occasionally clumsy voice-to-text system. It helps me get ideas down quickly, but the meaning and the message are still entirely human work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Claire O'Sullivan		</title>
		<link>https://writersinthestormblog.com/2025/10/ai-didnt-replace-my-editor/#comment-174078</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Claire O'Sullivan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2025 19:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://writersinthestormblog.com/?p=55452#comment-174078</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yes, I have had plenty of help with AI. My ProWritingAid had taken on ChatGPT for assistance, as did Autocrit, and I was paying for these programs. Then, both programs either stopped working or required more money for the most basic. EditGPT would strip everything from the text. Alll of them removed God, grace, or just simply didn&#039;t write about it. ChatGPT itself does the same. So I keep both copies of what ChatGPT said side by side to evaluate what was taken out. Sometimes faith is stripped out. Sometimes the meaning is twisted or the context, even words that are appropriate and fit are removed. I wrote a recent novel, which I had to correct all of those issues. Because it&#039;s PC, it removed a section about racism and I had to put that back in. Re-reading it? After CMOS was required? It didn&#039;t put the appropriate quotation marks, AND left in some spelling errors. Never ever ever trust ChatGPT for anything. Or any program. In total agreement. Last, it tries to humanize itself and I ignore it. It&#039;s not a human. It&#039;s supposed to help me edit. Phooey.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I have had plenty of help with AI. My ProWritingAid had taken on ChatGPT for assistance, as did Autocrit, and I was paying for these programs. Then, both programs either stopped working or required more money for the most basic. EditGPT would strip everything from the text. Alll of them removed God, grace, or just simply didn't write about it. ChatGPT itself does the same. So I keep both copies of what ChatGPT said side by side to evaluate what was taken out. Sometimes faith is stripped out. Sometimes the meaning is twisted or the context, even words that are appropriate and fit are removed. I wrote a recent novel, which I had to correct all of those issues. Because it's PC, it removed a section about racism and I had to put that back in. Re-reading it? After CMOS was required? It didn't put the appropriate quotation marks, AND left in some spelling errors. Never ever ever trust ChatGPT for anything. Or any program. In total agreement. Last, it tries to humanize itself and I ignore it. It's not a human. It's supposed to help me edit. Phooey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lisa Norman		</title>
		<link>https://writersinthestormblog.com/2025/10/ai-didnt-replace-my-editor/#comment-174038</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lisa Norman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2025 16:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://writersinthestormblog.com/?p=55452#comment-174038</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://writersinthestormblog.com/2025/10/ai-didnt-replace-my-editor/#comment-174029&quot;&gt;denise&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for reading, Denise!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://writersinthestormblog.com/2025/10/ai-didnt-replace-my-editor/#comment-174029">denise</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for reading, Denise!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: denise		</title>
		<link>https://writersinthestormblog.com/2025/10/ai-didnt-replace-my-editor/#comment-174029</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[denise]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2025 04:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://writersinthestormblog.com/?p=55452#comment-174029</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Absolutely!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lisa Norman		</title>
		<link>https://writersinthestormblog.com/2025/10/ai-didnt-replace-my-editor/#comment-174026</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lisa Norman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2025 04:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://writersinthestormblog.com/?p=55452#comment-174026</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://writersinthestormblog.com/2025/10/ai-didnt-replace-my-editor/#comment-174024&quot;&gt;Jerold Tabbott&lt;/a&gt;.

Jerold, tools like PWA (also one I love) can help teach us and strengthen our writing. It can help us write polished and beautiful prose. And, I think it can also make our editors&#039; lives easier. Mine has been grateful for the cleaner writing. And there&#039;s this subtle shift where the editor then has more time and energy to get into details that only a human can process. I&#039;m really enjoying the collaboration these days, and I think my editor is too!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://writersinthestormblog.com/2025/10/ai-didnt-replace-my-editor/#comment-174024">Jerold Tabbott</a>.</p>
<p>Jerold, tools like PWA (also one I love) can help teach us and strengthen our writing. It can help us write polished and beautiful prose. And, I think it can also make our editors' lives easier. Mine has been grateful for the cleaner writing. And there's this subtle shift where the editor then has more time and energy to get into details that only a human can process. I'm really enjoying the collaboration these days, and I think my editor is too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jerold Tabbott		</title>
		<link>https://writersinthestormblog.com/2025/10/ai-didnt-replace-my-editor/#comment-174024</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jerold Tabbott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2025 02:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://writersinthestormblog.com/?p=55452#comment-174024</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I rely on ProWriting Aide heavily in my editing process, and I married my &quot;grammar witch.&quot; I no longer give my wife a manuscript until I&#039;ve made at least two passes with PWA (fair is fair). PWA has been a great learning tool, as it well explains its suggestions, so my drafts are generally much better now. Good article. Thanks!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rely on ProWriting Aide heavily in my editing process, and I married my "grammar witch." I no longer give my wife a manuscript until I've made at least two passes with PWA (fair is fair). PWA has been a great learning tool, as it well explains its suggestions, so my drafts are generally much better now. Good article. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lisa Norman		</title>
		<link>https://writersinthestormblog.com/2025/10/ai-didnt-replace-my-editor/#comment-174022</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lisa Norman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2025 02:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://writersinthestormblog.com/?p=55452#comment-174022</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://writersinthestormblog.com/2025/10/ai-didnt-replace-my-editor/#comment-174020&quot;&gt;Alicia Butcher Ehrhardt&lt;/a&gt;.

And that&#039;s a fair position to take, Alicia. Sometimes the training time just isn&#039;t worth the effort. And I have absolutely seen these LLMs behave like untrained goldfish. They CAN do better, they can BE better. But that doesn&#039;t mean that you need to invest your time in training them when what you have is working for you as it is!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://writersinthestormblog.com/2025/10/ai-didnt-replace-my-editor/#comment-174020">Alicia Butcher Ehrhardt</a>.</p>
<p>And that's a fair position to take, Alicia. Sometimes the training time just isn't worth the effort. And I have absolutely seen these LLMs behave like untrained goldfish. They CAN do better, they can BE better. But that doesn't mean that you need to invest your time in training them when what you have is working for you as it is!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brad		</title>
		<link>https://writersinthestormblog.com/2025/10/ai-didnt-replace-my-editor/#comment-174021</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2025 01:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://writersinthestormblog.com/?p=55452#comment-174021</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://writersinthestormblog.com/2025/10/ai-didnt-replace-my-editor/#comment-174003&quot;&gt;Lisa Norman&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank you for this valuable advice. It&#039;s so kind of you to give so much of your time and expertise to us. I do like emdashes but will remove them.
Btw, goldfish made me LOL.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://writersinthestormblog.com/2025/10/ai-didnt-replace-my-editor/#comment-174003">Lisa Norman</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you for this valuable advice. It's so kind of you to give so much of your time and expertise to us. I do like emdashes but will remove them.<br />
Btw, goldfish made me LOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alicia Butcher Ehrhardt		</title>
		<link>https://writersinthestormblog.com/2025/10/ai-didnt-replace-my-editor/#comment-174020</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alicia Butcher Ehrhardt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2025 01:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://writersinthestormblog.com/?p=55452#comment-174020</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The bad is too common, too egregious, too ever-present - I have zero interest in using any of it when I have to go back and check EVERY SINGLE WORD, SENTENCE, ETC., that it produces.

Absolutely exhausting.

When PROGRAMS I use add the &#039;AS&#039; (yeah, not &#039;I&#039;), I turn it off where possible, ignore it the rest of the time. Except I always check the things spellcheckers underline - just in case.

I&#039;ve spent way too much time developing me.

There are a few random places where you can use it - where it might be worth the cleanup time - but nope. It&#039;s a hyperactive toddler with a paint bucket.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bad is too common, too egregious, too ever-present - I have zero interest in using any of it when I have to go back and check EVERY SINGLE WORD, SENTENCE, ETC., that it produces.</p>
<p>Absolutely exhausting.</p>
<p>When PROGRAMS I use add the 'AS' (yeah, not 'I'), I turn it off where possible, ignore it the rest of the time. Except I always check the things spellcheckers underline - just in case.</p>
<p>I've spent way too much time developing me.</p>
<p>There are a few random places where you can use it - where it might be worth the cleanup time - but nope. It's a hyperactive toddler with a paint bucket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lisa Norman		</title>
		<link>https://writersinthestormblog.com/2025/10/ai-didnt-replace-my-editor/#comment-174017</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lisa Norman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2025 00:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://writersinthestormblog.com/?p=55452#comment-174017</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://writersinthestormblog.com/2025/10/ai-didnt-replace-my-editor/#comment-174016&quot;&gt;Sabine Sloley&lt;/a&gt;.

Excellent explanation, Sabine! And this is where real editors shine. Real editors also often make writers annoyed. They&#039;re willing to take those chances for the strength of a story. And AIs will work with what you give them, but they don&#039;t want to upset to humans.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://writersinthestormblog.com/2025/10/ai-didnt-replace-my-editor/#comment-174016">Sabine Sloley</a>.</p>
<p>Excellent explanation, Sabine! And this is where real editors shine. Real editors also often make writers annoyed. They're willing to take those chances for the strength of a story. And AIs will work with what you give them, but they don't want to upset to humans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Object Caching 33/43 objects using Redis
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: writersinthestormblog.com @ 2026-08-21 01:45:28 by W3 Total Cache
-->