by Lisa Hall-Wilson
No one likes reading an info dump, but we writers justify their existence because we’re sure the reader needs all this background information here, right now. Info dumps kill the pace and tension in your story and readers may just put down your book and walk away forever.
“An info dump is a very large amount of information, usually backstory, supplied all at once in a narrative.” Backstory is important and vital to any character and story, but the reader doesn’t necessarily need to know all of what you know or have created. As any good introvert knows, people have to earn the trust to be told your entire life story, you don’t just verbally vomit on a stranger. It’s rude. *smile*
In an omniscient point of view, the worldbuilding Tolkien used in The Lord Of The Rings and The Hobbit is acceptable. Omniscient point of view though is largely out of favor with modern readers and acquisition editors.
It’s hard to ground the reader in time and place without front-loading a work with all the ways that world is different from our own world/reality/time/place. Whether you’re writing Steampunk, Space Opera, Edwardian romance, spec fic, etc etc — the key is to avoid large deposits of information. Let the world unfold for the reader as the character sees it. If everyone in your story world is green with large antennae, construct an organic scenario that would cause your character to notice it — because we don’t often think/comment on things that seem every day or ordinary.
An Info Dump:
Cassandra kept her claws rounded and painted which showed her pride in her appearance. The green-skinned passersby didn’t give her any notice. They kept their long antennae gleaming and straight. Her people were fastidious and prided themselves on their appearances. Not being noticed was a good thing.
Organic Worldbuilding:
Cassandra examined the filed ends of her claws. Last night’s fresh polish still glistened in the sun. Her antennae twitched, energy zinging to the ends of her fingers. She spun around, hands covering her gills.
Steve backed up half a step, palms up. “Sorry, didn’t mean to startle you.” His left antennae was bent and limp. Sickly splotches of purple marred his green skin.
A young couple swerved off the sidewalk, giving Steve a hard glare and covering their gills as they passed by. He tucked his broken claws into his palms as if trying to hide them.
Rank body odour hit her, a mix of sour seaweed and spoiled tuna. Cass shifted to the right so the slight breeze was at her back, carrying Steve’s germs and his body odour away from her. “Where’ve you been? You don’t look so good.”
If you’re writing your entire novel in deep point of view (as opposed to just using this technique for emphasis in key scenes), you can avoid backstory and worldview info dumps whether through narrative, internal dialogue or spoken dialogue by asking yourself these questions:
Remember, in deep point of view, we restrict the reader to only what the point of view character (POVC) knows, sees, hears, feels, touches, etc. But it’s also a very intimate and immediate style of writing, so something triggers them in the here and now — a smell, a sound.
With any bit of backstory or worldbuilding info you include, ask yourself why you’re putting that there, in that scene, right now. Is there an organic reason for the character to think of it? Otherwise it turns into what I call I-have-a-puppy syndrome. I’ve been a teacher in a variety of formal capacities, and it never fails that in a group of young children someone feels left out and interrupts the conversation by bouncing up and down, their hand shooting up in the air, to say, “I have a puppy!”
That’s what it feels like to the reader to be jerked out of the character’s head and sent on a bunny trail that neither feels organic to the moment or the character.
So, ask why you want to include that information in that place of the story. Ask why your readers need that information. Often, the reader needs only a fraction of what we think they need, but be sure and offer context for the character and the setting. Giving the reader too little information is as bad as too much.
Finally, ask whether the character really would think or talk about that bit of backstory or worldbuilding. Because we rarely explain things to ourselves that we already know.
There’s Bob with Cindy, his third girlfriend this year.
There’s Bob. Is it Cindy? No, that was the second one. Mindy? I don’t remember.
Do you struggle to identify info dumps in your work? What’s your Achilles heel? What kind of info dumps are you most prone to committing without realizing it?
* * * * * *
Lisa Hall-Wilson is a writing teacher and award-winning writer and author. She’s the author of Method Acting For Writers: Learn Deep Point Of View Using Emotional Layers. Her blog, Beyond Basics For Writers, explores all facets of the popular writing style deep point of view and offers practical tips for writers.
She runs the free Facebook group Going Deeper With Emotions where she shares tips and videos on writing in deep point of view.
Copyright © 2024 Writers In The Storm - All Rights Reserved
I have this problem. I have information near the beginning of my current WIP. It's not something the MC would think about at all as it's ingrained in her upbringing, but in order to make sense of the story, the reader needs to know, and not well into the story.
I am stuck as to how I can keep the POV and let the reader know this info. The characters wouldn't discuss it.
Thank you for this post. It has helped me pick out this problem.
Sometimes, using author intrusion is just the most expeditious way to to convey info. Sometimes, we just have to look at the scene from a few different angles.
I remember being totally lost the first 3 episodes of Yellowstone because I didn’t know who was who, who was related to who, why one was mad at another. But I really didn’t need all that and it became clear as the season continued. Hook a reader emotionally, they’ll keep going to find out those small details IMHO
Hi Lisa,
I have info dump issues with descriptions of characters. I've tried working that information into dialogue and actions.
Your examples help to clarify what I need to do.
Thanks!
Yes, I actually hear this a lot from ppl wanting to use dee POV. I’m working on a. Follow up post on my blog for Friday that will go in-depth into this problem with lots of examples. I’ll come back and leave a link in the comments when it’s published.
That's awesome, Lisa! We'll look forward to that link. 🙂
Great examples, Lisa, and your questions will be helpful!
Glad it was helpful!!
You've nailed it.
Basically, in deep third pov, DON'T info dump. If something absolutely has to go into the story (for the reader) NOW, then work until you find a solid reason for the pov character to think, imply, or say it, or you haven't done your job.
Your comment about using deep pov being used for emphasis in key scenes startled me - I never would have thought to do that. It sounded more like an omniscient pov technique to occasionally focus on a key character. I'll have to think about that.
I love the discipline of the deep third pov, and write with three main characters, weaving their view of the story, choosing which pov to tell the next piece of the story from by how it affects each of them, and a sense of balance to the total story, and how many scenes each character gets.
My villain gets the smallest 'third' - but has pretty good reasons for what she does and why - and people have on occasion told me they like her best! Because she's so close to right sometimes.
Some find using deep POV exclusively to be too intense, too intimate, or slow. This technique does favour stories that use introspection a lot. Some feel saving deep POV for key gut-punch moments in limited third or first person better for their story and voice. It’s all good.
I love writing important scenes in deep POV, but struggle with info dump. I find it particularly difficult when writing introspection in deep POV in my fantasy romances where the world building is complex and the characters are familiar with their society's rules and the setting. Your examples are creative and always helpful. Thanks for this post.
Yes, it’s definitely more work to convey those details through context and dialogue. Using the author voice in those scenes comes more naturally to me - I have to work hard to keep it in deep POV. Worth the effort though.
First-rate post, Lisa! Thank you! Loved your example. And your sum-up should be required reading for every writer.
Thanks!
Glad you found it helpful!
They're easy to fix in editing. You can delete them or move them to a better spot, fi they're needed.
They're easy to fix - if you know what you're looking for AND how to fix it. Takes practice -- and it's easier to just not include them to begin with eventually.
I’ve noticed a few times, when comparing notes of someone’s work, that I’ve disagreed with another’s take on show vs tell. And I have to say I don’t see your example of infodump fitting in with mine.
I rather see infodump as trying to include more information than immediately (or even ever) needed, in such a way the reader is pulled out of the narrative. But I don’t find that in your example. Instead, I see a simple, succinct ‘show’ and a flourished, expansive ‘show.’
Either example seems quite fine. All depends upon the mood and purpose of the scene. Perhaps it’s a tribute to how well it was written, that I found your infodump example to be the more sensitive and effective of the two.
I did not really see it as interrupting narrative, though, and therefore not a good example of infodump-at least how I’ve understood the issue.
Every writer I know struggles with the info dump. We think the readers need to know [fill in the blank], even though the reader almost never needs to know ANY of those things. LOL.
Thanks for another great Deep POV post. I can't get enough of them!
Excellent post. Your example of I-have-a-puppy syndrome made me laugh out loud!