

by Selene Grace Silver
Few things infuriate a reader more than a beloved character acting out of character for no logical reason because the writer needs the protagonist or antagonist to do something unexpected in service to a plot twist or development.
Today, readers crave character-driven stories, even in their high-action adventures featuring static heroes experiencing modest character arcs. Therefore, writers producing new stories need to create characters with well-developed personalities that feel authentic and real.
That requires writers to spend important time and research developing their main characters, especially their protagonists and antagonists.
Short of earning a double degree in psychology and literature, writers need to lean on what the writing and psychology experts tell us about human traits and psychological experiences. A new aspect of personality theory, called personality identity makes this task even easier to do well.
Resources like the Writers Helping Writers’ thesauri series and website, along with Lisa Cron’s book, Story Genius, offer writers effective strategies for developing great characters by addressing the connections between emotional wounds, misbeliefs, character arcs, and plot.
To identify a character’s goal and needs, we have to know what misbelief holds her back from just going out and getting what she wants.
To understand why a character developed a misbelief in the first place, we need to identify the origin wound that caused it to spring to life, and what additional experiences in her past reinforced it.
To determine whether an experience actually wounded a character emotionally, we need to know how her personality would respond to the event.
Finally, to craft an exciting, conflict-rich plot in which a reader stays up all night to find out what happens, we need to set in place the most difficult scenario and obstacles to challenge the character’s misbelief.
A writer can’t understand why a specific character feels, thinks, acts, or reacts in specific ways until they know the character intimately, including their psychological history and how it shapes them into the person they are at the start of a story.
It’s not enough to pick a random emotional wound out of an encyclopedia and assign a misbelief that might develop from it, then start plotting. That approach completely ignores personality theory.
Personality theory argues that people are born with distinct—often genetically inherited—ways of thinking, feeling, and behaving, and that those traits influence how an individual gets affected by life experiences. For example, researchers have linked the trait of introversion to the genetic evidence and persistence of shyness.
Placing an over-achieving intellectual Commander type (Extroverted-Intuitive-Thinking-Judger) on stage in front of a crowd when she is seven at the school Spelling B might spark excitement and a renewed sense of self-confidence in the child even if she loses. While placing another analytical personality, the serious Architect type (Introverted-Intuitive-Thinking-Judger) up for potential failure in front of his peers might damage his self-confidence for life, especially if he loses. Public embarrassment can easily become a motivating or debilitating experience, depending completely on the individual child’s personality.
One person’s wounding experience is another person’s motivating drive to be better. We can only know how or to what degree most damaging events affect a person if we know their personality type.
The 16 Personalities website is a fantastic resource for researching and developing a protagonist or other character’s wound and consequential misbelief using its added data on type identities.
Besides the classic personality traits: extroversion vs. introversion, intuitive vs. sensing, thinking vs. feeling, and judging vs. perceiving, the site’s researchers have further explored how these traditional traits get expressed differently in individuals with identities that tend towards optimism (Assertive identity) or pessimism (Turbulent identity).
Basically, the identities Assertive and Turbulent research delves into the different ways individual personalities view themselves and the world depending on whether they see the glass half full or half empty.
The really interesting aspect of this additional data is that writers can determine how a wounding experience early in life might damage a character’s personality development and subsequent approach to the world.
A character’s self-confidence can be impacted negatively or positively by a specific experience.
If we look at the Commander (ENTJ)’s personality profile again, we can see how this bold and strong-willed character type might be damaged by an early experience of losing a Spelling B in front of their peers and parents if they lean toward having a Turbulent identity. Or, losing the Spelling B might push them from being an Assertive over to a Turbulent identity.
Ninety-two percent of Assertive Commanders report having high self-confidence, while only 51% of Turbulent Commanders report the same. Also, 87% of Assertive Commanders experience increased motivation when a task is more difficult than expected, while a much lower 56% of Turbulent Commanders respond the same way.
With this added identity data, it’s easy to see how a specific personality type might lose some of their innate confidence and react differently to subsequent stress and challenges based on a wounding experience of losing the Spelling B.
To illustrate, let’s create a character named Matthew who has developed a Commander personality by age five, due to genetics and life experiences. He’s a little energetic machine of nonstop ambition who likes to win, be in charge, and boss his younger siblings around.
In first grade, he eagerly signs himself up for the school Spelling B. He studies and prepares, and then competes with complete confidence, winning first place. Or he loses first place to Ernie because he didn’t study much, but decides he’ll just work harder and beat Ernie next year.
The event reinforces his Assertive identity (ENTJ-A). Lesson learned with a positive, optimistic outcome.
But let’s say Matthew eagerly signs up for the Spelling B, but due to his personality’s tendency to be arrogant, doesn’t study much, and he loses after only one round. Shocked by the early loss and humiliation, his self-image and self-confidence take a hit, setting up a turn towards a Turbulent identity (ENTJ-T), in which he decides never to compete in a Spelling B ever again.
Lesson learned with a negative, pessimistic outcome.
Or, his ensuing misbelief, following other losses, could be that the only way to succeed is to over-prepare and work tirelessly in order to be good enough to win against the competition. Lesson learned, also with a potentially negative, pessimistic outcome.
In fact, his confidence has taken such a hit that at the start of your story, as an adult, Matthew only ever takes on jobs or challenges he knows he can win, and despite his competence and love of managing other people, he never applies for a management position at work. He never feels truly successful or wins the esteem of his loved ones because he never takes genuine risks, meaning his satisfaction in life is stifled.
What kind of plot and conflicts will the writer need to build into the story to force Matthew to learn to take risks in his work and life again?
Obviously, the plot must force Matthew into a scenario where he faces a task or challenge he’s never done before, then places a more skilled, experienced antagonist against him, then setup increasingly difficult hurdles and humiliating moments on the journey to the finish line, until poor Matthew finally decides he doesn’t care what anyone else thinks (regaining his Assertive identity), uses his natural intelligence and imagination to strategize a way to achieve his goal, and wins!
Not all character-wounding events need to turn characters into victims. They do need to damage the character’s personality in a way that prevents them from leading a satisfying, happy life.
One of the best approaches to creating the wound, misbelief, character arc, and a corresponding plot is to incorporate established expert knowledge from psychology into your character and plot development.
The added 16 Personality Traits Identity component is a wonderful resource for writing your character’s journey and story.
What emotional wound or misbelief have you explored in one of your characters, and how did it shape their journey?
Selene Grace Silver resides near the beach in Southern California with her romantic Scottish husband. Trained to read and write literary fiction, she never quite abandoned her early love of the romance genre.
After 20 + years teaching English, writing, and literature at the high school and college levels, she’s retired to write fiction full-time. She’s had to adjust her writing style and craft to suit genre fiction, which includes learning to plot and write complex characters. For Selene, an INFJ, writing is a journey of constant self-improvement.
To read a short prequel to the small-town beach romance series she’s developing, sign up for her newsletter. She’s also on Facebook, Instagram and Threads.
Copyright © 2026 Writers In The Storm - All Rights Reserved
Sensible article. It's good for authors to improve and enhance their understanding of the human personalities. The above-referenced model seems another variation on the Meyers-Briggs and FFP (CANOE) models–all useful for understanding and establishing a character's behavior... and later degree of malleability within a story line. As important is to know when and how to use this knowledge in your story.
Personally, I've always found myself comfortable with the characters I create on what I'd describe as an "intuitive" or "empathetic" level. For one reason, I tend to imbue all my characters with a reasonable level of common sense and intelligence. This is probably because I've been fortunate in my life to be surrounded by many such people. I've met a few idiots and nuts, too, but they are fewer and less interesting. Of course, perhaps they only seem fewer because they are easier to spot and avoid (a confirmation error in my analysis?).
Nevertheless, in my own writing, I know my characters from very early on. Whether they are bright or average or more limited, I've created them to fit the reality I've placed them in, without pre-documenting their tastes and dispositions. Tastes are eclectic, anyway. Dispositions are where I establish them when I first name them in a chapter. Changes or character arcs just need to faithfully follow the challenges and influence exerted on them by my other characters–who go through the same processes.
Much the same as in real life, where we are influenced not only by events but the people who surround us. And "smart" in real life is a matter of both degree and topic. The dumbest among us can sometimes give perfect advice, which the smartest thought too simplistic to suggest. Life is fluidic, so should be character arcs.
To help things along, at the right moments in character's narrative include useful backstory information. This will show what has shaped the character you've already presented to the reader.
That's awesome. I have learned that I need to know more about my characters in advance in order to plot a story that directly challenges them and forces them to face the thing(s)that is holding them back from being happy.
I love the deep dive into the personality types to help understand you characters.
I believe that all my characters, well main characters, have a very large part of myself in them. As if, I am writing traumas I didn't even realize I had.
I'm ISFJ on the chart and I really do think that comes across in my writing. I Love to write stories about characters protecting people, saving people, being the one who will give everything to help others.
I agree that it's inevitable that writers lean towards writing protagonists with whom they share traits. It's one of the reasons why I struggled so much in figuring out my characters' wounds. I have wounds of course, but how I've dealt with them is directly influenced by my personality. Same wound can manifest differently for different types. It's really helpful to line traits up with a wound and predict how that character would act/react/recover from a wound.
Abandonment is the shared wound of the two main characters in my new splint-in-time psychological suspense/thriller that I'm getting ready to publish. It was amazing how once I discovered that shared wound, how it drove the characters, which in turn drove their journeys--the plot.
Love this! I find that if I know my character's personality and wound, then I can really design a unique plot especially for them. I imagine knowing two characters share the same wound could limit the scope of the plot if they aren't coping and healing in complementary/contradictory ways.
My big topic seems to be all the different faces of shame. I seem to love writing about it. Every time I think I'm writing about something else--estrangement from a sibling, fear of failure, senior dementia, conflict with mom--it always circles back to shame.
It's a game at this point. Like 7 degrees of separation. How many ways can I think I'm writing about something else, and then when I give it over for critique they explain to me that I'm actually writing about shame. Again. I've just gotta laugh about it.
I've heard other authors talk about how every story a writer writes gravitates to the same wound and/or theme for them. Shame is an important topic to explore since it does so much damage to people's self-image. Learning to forgive/accept oneself as flawed and human is the healing lesson.
Law assignments used to give me a lot of stress, especially when I had to review multiple legal cases and prepare detailed analysis. Thankfully the <a href="[Link deleted]Assignment Writing Service simplified the process. Rapid Assignment Help offered outstanding support. Every assignment was original, well-researched, and delivered on schedule. Their guidance not only improved my grades but also reduced the pressure of tight deadlines and complex content.
On a separate note, <a href="[Link deleted]Construction 2025 strategy engineering students face similarly complex projects. Understanding its sustainability objectives, digital workflows, and modern construction techniques can be overwhelming. Expert help ensures assignments are accurate, thorough, and aligned with current industry practices while saving valuable time.