

In 1961 Marlboro Cigarettes promised that "It's What's Up Front That Counts" iin a magazine ad, and, while the ad featuring a smirking woman holding a smoke with a filter is (mercifully) gone, if it’s that thought that counts then possibly some up-front information will help readers navigate your novel.
In other words, a . . .
Table of Contents
Later we’ll get to what Wikipedia has to say. I know it’s traditional to start with a definition, for a lot of good reasons, we’ll get to it later. Quite a bit later, in fact.
“A beginning is the time for taking the most delicate care that the balances are correct.”
Princess Irulan
The Princess was right. Starting your story is important; if it weren’t the countless How-To Write books would not always say things like grab the reader’s attention early, and even before that first sentence there’s the up front material that can also help hook the reader and let them know what they’re in for.
A Table of Contents is a pre-organizer, a guide for your readers. Back in the day, potential readers standing in front of a shelf in a bookstore could look at a TOC to get a clue about the book’s structure. Not all novels have this sort of up-front skeleton, in some cases the structure is hidden and reveals itself as the story progresses. We have an example of this later in this essay.
So, a TOC is a structure, but there are many different approaches, just as a mid-century house has a very different look from one of the Victorian “painted ladies” in San Francisco.
Do you need to tell the reader the structure ahead of time?
Yes . . . and no.
You saw that one coming, didn’t you?
Do you need an overriding structure?
Insert previous answer.
First, some boundaries. This essay is about novels. Nonfiction works are a different kettle of fish, with different requirements.
“A beginning is the time for taking the most delicate care that the balances are correct.”
Right. Thanks, Princess. When I started this essay I felt I needed a structure. Searching for a structure I started thinking about old friends, not the flesh-and-blood kind, but the ones that live between covers and begin “Once upon a time.”
Now from Dune to 007:
“Mr. Bond, they have a saying in Chicago. The first time is happenstance, the second time coincidence, and the third time is enemy action.”
Ok, that works for a discussion of ways to structure your novel.
This is an interesting one. Look at Robert B. Parker’s Spenser books. Each chapter is about the same length, and usually one scene. This approach does several things for the writer and the reader. For the writer you don’t have to worry about when to break for the next chapter; it comes naturally. The result is a series of chapters of approximately the same length. So the readers know what to expect, making it a bit easier to decide whether or not to stay up and read a little more. (Most of us, including me, always answer that question “Sure, a few more pages.”) But with Spenser, Hawk, and Susan you have an idea how long “a few more pages” will be.
So, you want a straightforward structure — Chapter One, Chapter Two and so on. There are two ways to approach it. The first is to list the chapters and page numbers in a Table of Contents at the front of the book. The second is to skip that and let the Chapters reveal themselves to the reader.
Many novels are a series of chapters, given names to pique interest. Take a look at Dumas’ The Three Musketeers which opens with “The Three Presents of D’Artagnan The Elder.” I know the purists among you (and I know you’re out there) will say, “Wait, The Three Musketeers was published as a serial in a newspaper, something different.” Well, yes, but the chapters live in our books today. Cut me a little slack. It’s one of my favorite novels and I saw a chance to include it.
Look at Bonnie Garmus’ Lessons in Chemistry. There’s no Table of Contents, but there are chapters and each one is named. I personally like this kind of structure. It provides the reader with a clue as to what’s coming next, and — I’m speculating here but I bet I’m right — it’s kind of fun for the writer. “How much should I give away in the chapter title?” But the reader doesn’t get to see them all at once.
Books that take place over a short period of time have a natural built-in structure: Monday, Tuesday, and so on. For example, F. Paul Wilson in Bloodline uses a TOC divided into days, with each day broken into Chapter One, and so on. So there’s Monday, followed by Chapters 1 - 10, Tuesday followed by Chapters 1 -12. F. Paul Wilson does this in several of his Repairman Jack thrillers.
Micael Crichton does the opposite. He divides The Andromeda Strain into days, and the days into chapter, but the numbering continues. In other words, Day One has Chapters 1-4 and Day 2 starts with Chapter 5.
Another Crichton, with another interesting structure,
No TOC..
“First Iteration” “At the earliest drawings of the fractal curve, few clues to the underlying mathematical structure will be seen.”
--Ian Malcolm
“Second iteration. . .
This structure says plainly that trouble is brewing.
And now for Wikipedia
A table of contents is an ordered list of a document's sections, chapters, or topics and their corresponding page numbers, typically placed at the beginning of a long document like a book or report. Its purpose is to provide readers with an organized overview of the content and act as a navigation tool to quickly find specific information. You can create a table of contents by using a word processor's built-in feature,
“Hey, Siri, gimme a Table of Contents .” (Aka “Look, Ma, no hands!”)
Keystroke the document in Word, insert the appropriate tags, push a button and viola! Your TOC presents itself.
Send me the doc and my PC can read it aloud to me while I drive to work. Back home, the AI can offer an opinion on the story, maybe along the lines of “all right plot but the characters are mechanical.” (It’s possible that AIs are not that good at irony. Yet.) My feelings on this are outside the scope of this essay, so I’ll just say that I regard the decisions that go into creating a structure as part of the creative process and best left to the author.
1. Build the Table of Contents including titles, and the structure first, then fill in the missing pieces. Advantages: you think about the whole thing and see the parts. Disadvantage: you may very well find that one of your beloved chapter titles simply doesn’t fit and that you must get rid of it. Oh, the pain!
2. Type “Chapter One” and you’re on your way. Advantage: not a lot of up-front musing about the parts of the book. Disadvantage: you are faced with the dreaded, “What happens next?” over and over again.
3. Let the chapters reveal themselves. The advantage is the same as the disadvantage: you are letting your subconscious do the work but you aren’t aware yet.
Finally a few stories of my own adventures with structure. In my first thriller I had great chapters worked out, but after I wrote it something nagged at me, and it wouldn’t let go. The TOC actually helped, providing an overview, and then it hurt because that overview showed clearly that one chapter, one of my favorites, a piece of work that explained one of my characters, that sparkled but simply didn’t belong. The story didn’t need it, and the chapter head showed me.
In one of my later books I used chapters and gave each one a name and, you know what? It made the work more enjoyable (I called one of the chapters With a Little Help From My Friends and it gave me a chuckle).
A Table of Contents can be an up-front organizer, and most often it is. It can also be revealed as the reader progresses through the story. It can be straightforward— Chapter One, and so on. It can be straightforward with names — Chapter One, The Three Presents of of D’Artagnan The Elder. As a writer you can create it first, or as you write, or add it on after you have a draft.
It could be assembled by an AI, but why you would want to turn that important part of the creative process over to a machine, particularly a machine whose word-play is literal (anything but playful) is beyond me.
Now it’s your turn.
How do you build your TOCs? What flavor do you prefer? Have you used such a pre-organizer to identify parts of the story that need work or need to be removed? Have you encountered other structures in your reading and writing? What worked for you?
Always remember we are all in this together and I guarantee that other ink-stained wretches will benefit from your sharing.
* * * * * *
James R. Preston is the author of the multiple-award-winning Surf City Mysteries. He is currently at work on the sixth, called Remains To Be Seen. His most recent works are Crashpad and Buzzkill, two historical novellas set in the 1960’s at Cal State Long Beach. Kirkus Reviews called Buzzkill “A historical thriller enriched by characters who sparkle and refuse to be forgotten.” His books are collected as part of the California Detective Fiction collection at the University of California Berkeley.
Find out more about James at his website.
Copyright © 2026 Writers In The Storm - All Rights Reserved
Mostly no... My nonfiction has TOC with numbers and titles. My fiction only uses numbers. The Ebook version generates its own TOC. To the print version I concede a TOC but it's pretty boring...
1. ... 1
2. ... 12
3. ... 20
Etc... Yes it shows the chapter lengths, but maybe the book would be more surprising without it???
Good one, Matthew! Yeah, I think some of your writing could be more surprising without the TOC. One of the joys of writing is that the author makes the decision, sort of "You pays your money and you takes your chances." In the ebook fiction, are you satisfied with the way the TOC comes out? I have always done mine the old-fashioned way.
Thanks for commenting!
I build the TOC after I write the book. Then I can look at each scene in a chapter and see if a theme exists. The Title comes from the theme. Also, titles can come from lines in the text. But be consistent. Some books even use chapter titles that fit the theme of the work or have the same structure. In my WIP, chapter titles are bits of advice for a would-be spy: Don't Get Caught, Plan Defense, Lie with the Truth, etc.
Rats! Uh, I mean, thanks, Debbie. I wish I'd had you available to interview when I was working on this essay. You have provided an actual procedure for structuring a novel, and it's a good one. If I understand you correctly, you look at the scenes in the finished product to see how they naturally break into chapters.
BTW, I love the bits of advice for a would-be spy.
Thanks for providing a big boost to the blog. (Just kidding with the "Rats!")
Hi, James! I'm with Debbie, I only "chapterize" (?!) when I've finished my book. When writing, I organize (in Scrivener) by days, then scenes. When I'm done, I organize each day's scenes into chapters based on length or dramatic effect. Chapters are consecutive, so I guess I'm of the Andromeda Strain type. I do add chapter subtitles in the text, something like: "CIA Headquarters, Langley, VA, Monday, 10:15 am", but the TOC is just "Chapter 1". KDP seems to get the TOC right as long as my Word TOC is correct. I export Scrivener to Word, create the TOC, then upload to KDP. Best wishes!
Thanks, Jack. I have always liked titles or subtitles like "CIA Headquarters, Langley, VA Monday, 10:15 am" because they help me keep track of where I am in the story.
"Chapterize" -- yikes. the language moves on. I'll have to Google that.
Jack Bowie is the author of the excellent Adam Braxton series of thrillers. Thanks again, Jack.
That's a great explanation that I've been wondering about for some time but haven't found a good resource on. Until now. Thank you!
I don't make my TOC until the book is done, and all my chapter titles up to this point have been pretty plain.
That will be changing thanks to this article.
Love this topic. I've not seen it discussed before.
I've done a TOC with chapter one, chapter two, etc And I've done titles that come from something the main character learns in that chapters. Like others who have commented, I don't decide on the chapter titles until after I've finished the book.
Hi, Lynette. I think you have identified something important. It seems like most of us name our chapters after the book is done, sort of icing the cake.
Thanks for sharing!
Hi James,
I compile the TOC after the book is written and prefer chapter numbers as well as titles.
My WIP has an unusual first chapter title, "The End" as it is the end of life as my protagonist knew it. We'll see how that goes over.
I prefer title names in the books I read as that helps me easily return to favorite sections of the book. It's also helpful if I find an interesting turn of phrase or literary method I find useful.
Thank you for the interesting post!
Hi, Ellen -
First, apologies for the delayed response. I've been AFK for a birthday lunch.
I like chapter titles, too, for much the same reason, and it's good to see another vote for doing chapters after the book is done.
When I read the title of your Chapter 1, "The End" not only did I like it, it also rang a bell. Turns out it's not in a book, but a miniseries. The remake of King's The Stand has as Part 1 an episode called "The End," referring to the plague that wipes out most of the human population. So you are in good company!
Thanks!
I don't like TOCs for fiction, but they're required for ebooks. I don't use them in my print versions. Mine are simply "Chapter 1, Chapter 2" etc. I can barely come up with a title for the book, so the thought of naming chapters sends me screaming for the hills.
LOL Terry, I know what you mean! There's a reason only one of my novels has chapters with titles. They started coming to me and I couldn't stop, but I wouldn't want to do it all the time. On the othre hand, that novel is one of my favorites . . .
For those who might not know, Terry is the author of many excellent mysteries. Look for the newest, The Triple-D Ranch series.
Thanks, Terry!
Classic romance generally doesn't have TOC--I don't use it.
Interesting article, because I particularly like books I read to have chapter titles, and I including them in all my work. The idea of using them but not having a table of contents is food for thought. I do, so far, include a TOC.
The benefit to me is that I can easily recollect what is where and which happens first, simply by looking at the TOC–great for reviewing/double-checking during the writing process. The second is because I simply enjoy teasing the reader as to what's inside each new chapter. Usually, I use a twist on a common meme or phrase to suggest what action they'll find in the chapter.
Some on my chapters contain a single scene, but others contain several scenes whose common link is the title. I like the whimsy of it. And the flexibility.
some titles are: Leaks of Faith (three scenes regarding dangerous political videos), Sleight of Face (trouble debunking deep fake videos), Arrested Development ( framing FSB for assassination of imprisoned Russian premier).