Writers in the Storm

A blog about writing

storm moving across a field
A Place To Write

by Barbara Linn Probst

There’s a special writing area I’ve created for myself. A glass-topped desk with very little to clutter the surface: laptop, coffee mug, desk lamp, and my little “owl with tiara” mascot.

The desk faces a large window that looks out on trees and distant hills. No houses, cars, or people. A black ergonomic chair.

I like having this special, dedicated place. I do other things there—emails, PayPal, cropping my photos—but mostly it’s where I write. The time of day varies, from early morning to late at night; the place, less so. 

I wondered what other people did, what their writing spaces were like. So I asked.

I posted a photo of my desk on a few Facebook groups for writers and invited people to respond with their own photos or descriptions. A lively discussion ensued, with dozens of people taking part.

Here’s what I learned and what I think it means.


It seems there are three workspace camps.

The cave-dwellers.  In one camp were those, like me, who needed quiet and calm. 

  • I have a loft room called the tower
    where I look out over the trees to the river and the mountains. This is a place
    where I can hide from the world below.
  • A quiet room. Serene jewel toned
    walls, comfy chair and tea. I don’t even want music.
  • I prefer more of a cave situation—no-to-little
    outside stimulation, certainly no music or background talking to distract me.
  • I have a She-Shed. I need complete
    quiet.
  • I have to have complete silence so I
    can hear myself think.

Among the cave-dwellers, some found a beautiful view helpful:

  • I've got a beautiful view that keeps
    me peaceful.
  • I do best outside in sight of
    natural beauty.
  • Next to the window overlooking our
    local church and gorgeous old town. Very inspiring.

Others, in contrast, found views distracting.

  • A view would distract me from the
    images in my mind.
  • No views. I need to focus and am
    afraid if I looked out the window I’d start taking pictures instead of writing.

The white-noisers.  In another camp were the people who concentrated best in coffee shops and places filled with lots of background noise.

  • I like the anonymity within the
    usually jovial background.
  • I go to a very busy cafe where they
    let you linger and everyone has laptops. There’s
    something about the vibe. 
  • I like writing in Starbucks. I like
    that it forces a couple of hours of focus before I've overstayed my welcome and
    need to pack up and go home.
  • I think there is something about the
    shared work environment, the white noise, and the lack of domestic distractions
    that works really well.

The anywhere-and-everywhere writers.  A third group wrote wherever and whenever they could. For some, this was because it was the only realistic option. Others simply stopped and wrote when an idea struck them.

  • Literally anywhere. I’ve learned not
    to be picky.
  • I write when and where I can—in my
    office, yes, but also at the kitchen table, at the library, at the ballet
    school, between rounds of History Bee. I take what I get.
  • It doesn't matter if it's home, in a
    coffee shop, a hotel room, a park or if it's serene, chaotic, noisy, or a mess
    as long as I can sit with my laptop on my lap.
  • In my car, on the open. I scribble
    on a legal pad at stoplights and record dialogue on my phone. Anytime.
    Anyplace.
  • I can write anywhere I get an idea,
    thanks to dictation/notes on my phone and a lightweight laptop I carry everywhere.

Three different answers, right? Or maybe not.

The more I thought about it, the more I realized that everyone was doing the same thing. In one way or another, they were creating a sealed-off environment where the world of the story could dominate, rather than the world of ordinary life.

They did this by entering a special place or a special time. Three hours every Monday night at Starbucks. A corner of the basement—“it’s cluttered, but it’s mine.” A special armchair or a space in an unused bedroom. During the hour-long train ride to work.

In order to enter the story world, they had to subdue or transform the sensory stimulation of the regular world.

Through silence, noise-cancelling headphones, music, or the ambient sounds of strangers, each person erected her own auditory shield—a protective ring, a barrier, that let them focus on the interior world of their imagination.

Visual stimulation seemed less problematic. Perhaps because it’s easier to stay focused on a laptop or notebook, resisting the urge to look elsewhere, than it is to block out the intrusive sounds that reach us without our choosing to attend to them.

In the old Star Trek movies, a deflector shield was raised to ward off incoming energy that was vibrating at a frequency other than that of the shield itself—in other words, to repel distractions as well as dangers.

When we’re trying to write, incoming impressions that aren’t relevant to the story world need to be repelled—so we create our personal shields.  One person summed it up well: “Above all, a place where I’m alone with my thoughts. I can be in a crowded place as long as I don’t know anyone else or get distracted.”

It’s the internal place that really matters. The external place is just the container. Without that dedicated internal place—that special state of immersion in the world of our characters—the most exquisite, well-appointed office won’t necessarily help. Sometimes the external place, with its accessories and associations, does help us shift into the internal one.

At other times, when we don’t have access to the time or place where we believe we write best, we find another way. Artist Georgia O’Keeffe painted inside her car when the weather was too hot in the New Mexico desert. At a workshop I attended, renowned author Alice Hoffman told us that she often writes on her iPhone. 

We write—when, where, and because we must.


What about you?

Where do you write best? What are the key elements of that environment? Is there a place that’s surprisingly conducive to writing for you—a place that might seem odd to others, but works for you?

What are the essential “writing shields” you need?

Are you getting what you need, or are there small changes you can make in your writing space that would help?

About Barbara

Barbara Linn Probst is the author of Queen of the Owls, coming in April 2020 from the visionary, award-winning She Writes Press. Queen of the Owls has been chosen by Working Mother as one of the twenty most anticipated books for 2020 and will be the May 2020 selection of the Pulpwood Queens, a network of more than 780 book clubs throughout the U.S. To pre-order or learn more, please visithttp://www.barbaralinnprobst.com/

Queen of the Owls by Barbara Linn Probst

A chance meeting with a charismatic photographer will forever change Elizabeth’s life.

This novel asks the question: How much is Elizabeth willing to risk to be truly seen and known?

Click here to read more, or to pre-order the book.


Read More
Will Your Character Fight, Flee, or Freeze?

Julie Glover

A minister, a priest, and a rabbi are walking down a dark alley -- no, this is not a joke, but hang with me here -- when an eight-foot, three-headed monster jumps out, roars, and bares his sharp teeth and claws.

The minister throws a punch.
The priest runs.
The rabbi can't seem to move.

See? I told you it wasn't a joke. It's acute stress response; that is, the way our bodies and minds handle the presence of an immediate threat.

One fights.
One flees.
One freezes.

You've heard of those, but how can writers apply this knowledge to our stories? How can the fight-flight-freeze response be used to ratchet up tension and guide action for our characters?

First, the Visceral Reaction

Physiologist Walter Cannon coined the phrase "fight or flight," back in the 1920s, to describe the adrenaline rush and response people exhibit when faced not only with physical emergencies, but psychological ones as well. In recent years, scientists added a third option: tonic immobility, or "freeze."

This video explains these reactions well. (And yes, there's a quick sales plug for the video's creator at the end.)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJhcn7Q0-LU

That list of symptoms alone can help us better write our characters' acute stress responses! Which of these might your protagonist exhibit?

  • Quick, shallow breathing
  • Fast heartbeat
  • Chest pain
  • Need to urinate
  • Dry mouth
  • Nausea
  • Butterflies in stomach
  • Cold hands
  • Sweaty palms
  • Trembling and/or weak hands and legs
  • Tension in thighs, neck, or shoulders
  • Negative memories
  • Tunnel vision / loss of peripheral vision
  • Reduced ability to read facial expressions
  • Dizziness / feeling one might faint (but they won't)

Then Fight, Flight, or Freeze

In The Unthinkable: Who Survives When Disaster Strikes -- and Why, journalist Amanda Ripley shared how people responded to disasters, from an explosion to Hurricane Katrina to Tower 1 on 9/11 and more.

Fight is actually an uncommon response, with fleeing and freezing more likely. Freezing can be seen both in denying the severity of a situation and/or dithering so long about what to do that opportunities to effectively deal with the disaster pass, leaving the worst option as the inevitable one.

So let's say your main character is facing a disaster -- be it an alien invasion, an inferno, or high schoolers storming the cafeteria for the last of the Twinkies. Starting with the visceral reaction:

Gayle's mouth went dry, her heart sped up to a gallop, and her knees buckled.

Then what? Is your protagonist the type to fight, flee, or freeze? Which answer determines what happens next, as well as the pace of the action.

Fight

Gayle didn't have time to think. Didn't allow herself to think. Adrenaline poured into her veins. She dove forward and slashed at the laser-wielding alien. If she was going down, she'd take it with her.

Although fight is an uncommon response, this is fiction and we like kick-butt heroes. Plus, an ensuing fight definitely puts tension on the page.

Flight

At the sight of the laser-yielding alien, Gayle's brain yelled, "Run!" Her feet obeyed. Dodging tables and chairs, she sprinted across the room.

Gayle heard crashes and shots and screams behind her, but all she could see was the door ahead. She had to get to reach that exit.

Flight is a more common response, and you can see the tension and conflict her choice creates. Is everyone else in the area running for the door, causing a logjam at the exit? Might the alien chase after her? Could she stumble? Injure herself? Find the door barred or locked?

Freeze

Gayle couldn't move, couldn't speak, couldn't think. Al-al-alien. That right there was the stuff of science fiction, a creature from the Star Wars cantina, an impossibility. Only there it was, not only three-dimensional and fully present but shooting lasers at people around her.

Numbly, she watched people fall. Were they dead or just stunned?

Her brain struggled to process what was happening. She was caught between two worlds, the real one she'd been in moments ago and this surreal one where nothing made sense. There had to be a link between the two, even if that link was only Gayle herself.

The alien stomped toward her, its sinister eyes bulging, green teeth bared, weapon raised. Gayle's jaw dropped open and her feet weighed a million pounds each, gluing her to the floor.

If she just stands there, she might get squashed like a bug. But you can keep tension up. Does someone rescue her, but it's not someone she wants rescuing her? Could the alien kidnap rather than kill her? Might she discover that silence and immobility are the only way to avoid an attack? (Looking at you, The Quiet Place.)

Combining Responses

You don't have to choose only fight, flight, or freeze. Your character might go through two or all of them.

Real-life case in point: My mother has a phobia of frogs, possibly due to a near-drowning event in her childhood. Anyway, I was in college when I saw the depth of her fear up close and personal. A frog had gotten into our forest-surrounded home, and my mother's acute stress response caused her to shut down quickly and thoroughly when confronted with a harmless amphibian that could fit in the palm of my hand.

She was frozen. But I snapped her out of her trance and got her to flee. Mind you, my first few few requests did not work. I literally had to get in her face and yell, "Get out of here!" But then she startled and scurried away, and I returned Senor Frog to his natural habitat outside. Crisis averted.

When you write a combination, you'll likely need another trigger to change the first response to a new one. For example:

  • Your character flees, but then hears a child's cry and runs back to fight.
  • Your character surges forward to fight, gets knocked down, and freezes.
  • Your character freezes, but a glancing blow awakens their desire to fight back.
  • Or like my scenario: Your character freezes until prodded by another character to flee.

Scene and Sequel

The fight-flight-freeze response is driven by the amygdala, a structure of neurons in the brain linked to fear, pleasure, and aggression.

What we actually think about a situation, however, involves different parts of the brain. The cognitive processes of evaluation, self-regulation, and behavioral goals happen in the frontal lobes, parts not as active when you're in panic mode.

If you're familiar with the scene-sequel structure, originally proposed by Dwight Swain, you may already see how these differing brain functions align with that model.

When our character goes through a jarring event, their immediate stress response is part of the scene. It's what's happening right then and there and how they react. Since it's amygdala-driven, hold off on describing the processing one goes through later to make sense of what's happening and to determine the next goal. It's in the sequel where you have that cognitive processing, and that may involve a few lines or a whole chapter.

So when it comes to fight-flight-freeze, you're not likely to see something like this:

Bob's feet sank into the floorboards, and his heart throbbed against his ribs. How had she found out? He'd been so careful to hide all the receipts. To keep a separate bank account. To use a fake name whenever possible.

Maybe he could get his wife back. They could go to counseling. That's it--he'd schedule a counseling appointment in the morning.

Um, no. That second paragraph is unlikely to happen right away. Your character will need more time hanging out with their stress response, which is good news for your reader. Because that's more tension, more wondering how things will go, more continuing to read to find out.

Exactly how fast your character moves from the fight-flight-freeze scene to the executive-function sequel depends on who they are.

Different characters or even the same character in different seasons will recover differently. For a quick example, imagine the acute stress response recovery time for Sarah Connor before and after her encounter with the Terminator.

Where on the spectrum between these women is your character? Write to that timing.

How have you used fight, flight, or freeze in your own story? What more do you want to know about using acute stress response to create conflict and reveal character?

Resources
"Exploring Human Freeze Responses to a Threat Stressor," Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
"Walter Cannon: Homeostasis, the Fight-or-Flight Response, the Sympathoadrenal System, and the Wisdom of the Body," Brain Immune
"Understanding the stress response," Harvard Health Publishing

About Julie

Julie Glover writes mysteries and young adult fiction. Her YA contemporary novel, SHARING HUNTER, finaled in the 2015 RWA® Golden Heart® and is now on sale! When not writing, she collects boots, practices rampant sarcasm, and advocates for good grammar and the addition of the interrobang as a much-needed punctuation mark.

Julie is represented by Louise Fury of The Bent Agency. You can visit her website here and also follow her on Twitter and Facebook.

Read More
The 3 Levels of Trust in Publishing

by John Peragine

In a recent blog post on Writer’s In the Storm, writers provided one word for other writers to contemplate for the New Year. The word I chose was Trust.

I am a ghostwriter by trade and have years of experience writing and publishing books. When people hire me, they do so because I have a sense of the process.

Often (too often) people hire me and stop listening. They don’t always trust what I am saying to them, even though they hired me for that very purpose. I don’t know all the answers to publishing and writing questions. Luckily, for those times I don’t know, I have built a team of other professionals I trust to provide me those answers.

I've been thinking about my writing journey and that of others I know, and trust is a powerful determiner for a book, from concept to publishing. Trust is not something given lightly, but at times, we have to take a risk and place trust outside ourselves to move a book from our heads to the page.  

It's not always easy to do. We must ask questions for clarity.

There are many pathways to writing and publishing. Whichever one we choose, we must see it through and trust those guiding the way. We must rely on our inner voice and the advice of others throughout the entire process of writing, but I believe that it can be a methodical process in which we can increase our chances of success.

Important questions:

  • At what points do we rely on trust?
  • How can we reduce the risks involved with trust?
  • Is trust something blind, or is it strategic?

Christmas Morning Confession


Image by Bob Dmyt from Pixabay 

My family would tell you that I have a serious holiday problem. I can’t wait to open presents until Christmas morning.

The anxiety overwhelms me on Christmas Eve. Every. Single. Year. My family rolls their eyes at me. But by 6 pm, it is imperative that I know what’s in the boxes, and I must see other people open the presents I got them.

I know, I’m incorrigible. But it boils down to this: I don’t like not knowing the outcome of things, and I don’t like taking unreasonable chances.

In book writing and publishing, I don’t take too many chances either. When I decide what to write, or how to publish a book or article, I remove any doubts I can. I decrease risk while increasing trust.

How do I do this?

I believe there are three levels of trust: trust others, trust a process, and trust myself.

Trust Others


Image by KoalaParkLaundromat from Pixabay

We don’t have to reinvent the wheel every time we decide to write and publish something. There is a process, and a method that can be followed that will lead to a successful venture.

There are many people to connect within the publishing business and I follow a process. This process also works with agents, publishers, or other writers.

  1. A blank slate. When I meet someone new, I see them as a blank slate and trust what that person says and claims. I have no evidence to the contrary. I try to reserve judgment and keep their slate clean.
  2. Trust but verify. If someone refers an editor to me, I ask the person making the referral what their experience was with the editor. But their positive experience does not guarantee I will have the same experience. Maybe they just clicked, or were friends. Perhaps there is a finder's fee for referring to the editor. There are many unknowns and I try not to let them positively or negatively affect my trust in that editor.

I begin with trust and build upon it based upon performance. Questions I ask myself include:

  • Do I trust the person making the referral?
  • Have they referred me to other professionals in the past?

I build trust by beginning small. I might have the editor do one or two pages of editing to see how they perform. I follow these considerations:

  • Did they edit the way I asked them?
  • Was it on time?
  • Were they thorough?

I increase the size of the job, and with every success, my trust in them builds. Perhaps answer the following questions:

  • Do they return calls and messages?
  • Do they listen to me? Can they provide examples of past performance?
  • Can they offer me references of others they worked with?

The process of writing is a solitary craft, but the process of publishing is a team effort.

You need to trust those you work with, and you must decide for yourself, based upon the data you collect, whether you can trust an individual. Choosing the wrong person can cost you time, money, and credibility as a writer.

Trust the Process

A question I hear a lot: How do we write a great book and have success selling it? I share my process, but people often stop listening.

There is the social proof disconnect. Writers listen to friends and family, who mostly have the best intentions, provide them with advice about book writing. My question is, “How many books have they written and sold?

I provide people with the same process that helped me, and many others produce a successful book they are proud of that sells copies.

As a writer, we must trust others we are working with. If we believe they are an expert with valuable advice, then we must trust their process.

Trust Myself

Image by HAPPY NEW YEAR *** S. Hermann & F. Richter from Pixabay

In the creation of a book, there is an important word on the front cover. More important than the title, and that is the author’s name. It is you.

This is your book. Your project. You call the shots, and you should never give away total control of your book. Nor should you stop asking questions, because even if you trust someone, and trust the process, you must trust your gut because it is your name on the spine.

I recently presented a manuscript to a literary agent I trust. She has an excellent track record, and I would love to work with her. I gave her my first ten pages to review, and she was excited about the premise, the characters, and the pace of the story. She deemed it a Middle-Grade Fantasy and I trusted her assessment.

As part of the process of selling a book in this genre, she recommended that I shift the POV from third person limited to first-person.  I rewrote those pages in the first-person POV as she recommended. It wasn't a bad attempt, and she liked it, but then I considered the rest of the book.

Would shifting the rest of the book to first-person work?
Was my book truly Middle Grade or was it more YA?

I sent out two versions of my first ten pages to other experts for their opinion. I received mixed reviews on the POV but there was a strong opinion that the book is YA, not Middle Grade.

Ultimately, I must decide what the book is and will be. I have people I trust, and I trust the process, but at the end of the day, I must trust the guy whose name is on the spine of the book.

This is the hardest form of trust but a smart one to learn: listen to the inner voice advising us

Ask the right questions, do your due diligence, and write the best, most successful book you can. Trust in yourself -- you are an author. Whatever you decide, it will be the right decision.

How have you trusted your own intuition in terms of your writing? Do you have advice you didn't take, but wish you had?

About John

John Peragine has published 14 books and ghostwritten more than 100 others. He is a contributor for HuffPost, Reuters, and The Today Show. He covered the John Edwards trial exclusively for Bloomberg News and The New York Times. He has written for Wine EnthusiastGrapevine Magazine, Realtor.com, WineMaker magazine, and Writer's Digest.

John began writing professionally in 2007, after working 13 years in social work and as the piccolo player for the Western Piedmont Symphony for over 25 years. Peragine is a member of the American Society of Journalists and Authors. His newest book, The No Frills Guide to Book Marketing, will be released in Summer 2020.

Top photo credit: Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay 

Read More

Subscribe to WITS

Recent Posts

Search

WITS Team

Categories

Archives

Copyright © 2026 Writers In The Storm - All Rights Reserved