Writers in the Storm

A blog about writing

storm moving across a field
May 13, 2026

Heroine’s Journey vs Interiority: What Writers Need to Know

a woman standing on top of a rock with her arms in the air

by Susan Watts

In my previous article, we explored how powerful stories often contain both the outward movement of the Hero’s Journey and the inward transformation of the heroine’s journey. One shapes what the character must face in the world. The other shapes what the character must face within themselves.

But another question came up while I was writing about the heroine’s journey. Is it simply another name for interiority?

The short answer is no.

Interiority is a writing technique that lets readers experience what a character feels from inside the moment. The heroine’s journey is a story structure that shapes the changes a character must undergo.

A story can contain deep interiority without following the heroine’s journey at all. And a story can follow the heroine’s journey structure even if its interiority is light. The two often appear together because they strengthen each other, but they are not interchangeable.

Understanding the difference can help you recognize what kind of transformation your story may actually need.

Interiority Brings Readers Inside the Experience

Writers often hear the word interiority and assume it means describing emotions more deeply. But interiority is not about naming feelings. It is about letting readers experience a moment from inside the character. Instead of observing events from a distance, readers feel hesitation before a decision. They experience what’s happening now through the influence of something that happened before. They feel tension before action lands.

This creates emotional proximity. A decision becomes more than an action. It becomes a lived experience.

Here are examples of what interiority might look like:

Without interiority

Her hands trembled.

This shows a reaction.

With interiority

Her hands trembled. If she reached for the doorknob now, he would see it.

Now readers experience the moment with her instead of observing it from the outside.

Here’s another example:

Without interiority

He stayed quiet.

With interiority

He stayed quiet. Saying the truth now would only make things worse.

The action hasn’t changed. What changed is access to the character’s thinking inside the decision.

Interiority brings readers closer to the character’s experience. That closeness strengthens nearly every kind of story. Mysteries, fantasies, romances, and thrillers all rely on interiority to create emotional presence.

But closeness alone does not create a heroine’s journey. That requires something different.

The Heroine’s Journey Is About Reclaiming Something That Was Set Aside

The heroine’s journey centers on recognition instead of conquest. Rather than proving strength by overcoming an enemy, the character discovers they must recover something they set aside earlier in life before the story can move forward.

Sometimes that lost element is trust.

Sometimes identity.

Sometimes connection.

Sometimes permission to use their own voice.

External conflict still drives the story forward. Dragons still appear. Doors still close. Enemies still act. But the turning point comes when the character stops trying to meet expectations and starts trying to become true to who they are.

That is the structural work of the heroine’s journey.

Why Writers Sometimes Mistake Strong Interiority for a Heroine’s Journey

Modern fiction often uses deep point of view and emotional immediacy, so readers spend more time inside a character’s thoughts and reactions than ever before. That closeness can make a story feel internal, even when the character’s identity hasn’t actually changed. Because of that, writers sometimes assume their story is following a heroine’s journey when what they are really seeing is strong interiority. Or vice versa.

A character can experience fear, doubt, hesitation, and emotional conflict throughout a story without reclaiming anything essential about who they are. Those experiences deepen the reader’s connection to the character, but they do not create a heroine’s journey on their own.

Story Examples of the Heroine’s Journey vs. Interiority

Strong stories often include both movements at once. Interiority lets readers experience the transformation as it happens. The heroine’s journey gives that transformation meaning.

Examples from popular movies include:

The Hunger Games: Katniss Everdeen

Interiority

Katniss evaluates threats in the arena, counts arrows, reads other tributes’ intentions, and constantly calculates survival odds.

Readers feel:

  • fear
  • strategy
  • protectiveness toward Rue
  • anger toward the Capitol

That’s interiority. We’re inside her decision-making.

Heroine’s Journey moment

Katniss raises the berries and refuses to perform the Capitol’s script. She stops being a pawn and becomes someone who defines her own role.

The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King: Aragorn

Interiority

Aragorn hesitates repeatedly about claiming kingship.

We experience:

  • self-doubt
  • reluctance
  • loyalty conflicts
  • fear of repeating Isildur’s failure

Readers are inside his uncertainty.

Heroine’s Journey movement inside a Hero’s Journey story

Aragorn accepts that he is the rightful king. He stops avoiding identity and steps into it.

The war still must be won—but the story cannot resolve until he accepts himself.

The Devil Wears Prada: Andy Sachs

Interiority

Andy struggles to survive Miranda’s expectations.

We experience:

  • her stress
  • her insecurity
  • her ambition conflict
  • her exhaustion

That’s interiority.

Heroine’s Journey moment

Andy walks away from Miranda’s world. Not because she failed. Because she recognizes it isn’t who she wants to become.

She reclaims identity.

Why This Difference Matters During Revision

Your manuscripts may reach a stage where the structure appears sound, but something still feels unfinished.

Sometimes the missing element is stronger interiority. Readers need closer access to the character’s experience as events unfold. Other times, the story is waiting for a moment of recognition that allows the character to reclaim something they have been living without.

Those are different revisions. Knowing which one your story needs can save enormous time. The distinction becomes especially useful when a manuscript feels emotionally close to working, but still feels unfinished.

A Quick Diagnostic Question for Your Manuscript

If your story feels emotionally distant, ask:

  • Do readers experience the character’s thoughts, memories, and physical reactions during important moments?

If not, the manuscript likely needs stronger interiority.

If your story feels immersive but still unresolved, ask:

  • Does the character reclaim something essential about themselves before the ending?

If not, the manuscript may be missing a heroine’s journey.

One problem affects closeness.

The other effects completion.

What to Revise When One Element Is Missing

If interiority is thin:

Bring readers closer to decisions as they happen. Let them experience hesitation, memory, and meaning from inside the character rather than summarizing after the fact.

If the heroine’s journey is missing:

Look for something the character learned to silence earlier in life and ask where the story allows them to reclaim it.

Often, the strongest revision move is not adding action.

It is restoring identity.

A Question for You:
Does your story already show what your character feels—or is it still waiting for the moment when they understand who they are allowed to be? (The answer usually reveals what your next revision needs most.)

* * * * * *

About Susan:

Susan Watts author photo

Under the pen name Michelle Allums, Susan Watts has authored a young adult urban fantasy titled, The Jade Amulet and is currently writing the sequel. Her short stories are also included in the anthologies Christmas Roses and Forever and Always.

Susan has dedicated over four decades to training in multiple martial arts styles and holds the impressive title of a five-time US Karate Alliance world black belt fighting grand champion. Through her karate school, she is able to impart martial arts and life skills. Susan also incorporates her martial arts knowledge into her writing.

An avid triathlete, she keeps in shape by running, biking, and swimming. She lives in the country with her husband, where they raise animals and enjoy being outdoors. Susan also has three grown children and numerous grandchildren. In addition, she is a CPA and VP of finance for a company in her hometown. 

You can connect with Susan on social media or her website.

Share this:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

18 comments on “Heroine’s Journey vs Interiority: What Writers Need to Know”

  1. I struggle with both these concepts and it shows from comments I receive on structure. These explanations are a key to me getting to understand not only the difference but also the methods. There may be hope for me yet! Thank you, Ms Susan.

    1. Thank you! I think writers often use the two together so naturally that they start to feel interchangeable. Once I understood the difference, it changed the way I approached revisions.

  2. I love that you're addressing the concept of the Heroine's Journey in this post and the previous one. I am especially enjoying Gail Carriger's perspective—the contrast of Hero going it alone versus Heroine building a team. Great stuff.

  3. I've shared this with my critique group. We have a few writers who struggle to do this and it was a nice distinction and check-up for my own writing. I can certainly get hyper-focused on those immediate emotions. Thank you!

    1. Thank you so much—and I’m honored you shared it with your critique group! This is one of those craft areas where even experienced writers can slip into ‘reaction-only’ scenes without realizing it. I know I still have moments where I revise and realize the body is reacting, but the reader still isn’t fully inside the experience yet.

  4. Excellent breakdown. I've instinctively known about the heroine's journey and work to bring it to life in my own work but have really struggled trying to explain it to others. Thank you. I now have a term to use and a clear distinction to make.

    1. Thank you! It’s a subtle distinction, but it can completely change how we approach emotional depth and character arcs.

  5. Hi Susan,

    Thank you for explaining the difference between interiority and the Heroine's journey. They tend to be so woven together in my mind that I never thought about the differences.

    1. Thank you! I think many of us intuitively feel the difference while reading long before we recognize it. That’s what made the topic so interesting to explore.

  6. Can interiority happen in first person? Example: so and says something...

    "I shivered. The implications were too frightening to consider at the moment."

    Is that interiority or merely 1st person narration?

    Thanks. I can see how and why "the transformative moment" plays well with interiority. Something to think about.

    Thanks

    1. That’s a great question. Interiority absolutely can happen in first person. In fact, first person often creates immediate access to it. The distinction is less about POV and more about whether readers are simply being told information or actually experiencing the moment alongside the character.

      In your example:

      ‘I shivered. The implications were too frightening to consider at the moment.’

      the first sentence is a visceral reaction, while the second moves toward interiority because it reveals the character’s interpretation of the moment. If you wanted to deepen the interiority further, you could make the thought feel even more immediate or specific to the character’s personal fear or history.

  7. Hi Susan,

    Enjoyed reading your article for WITS. Full of helpful tips for writers.

    I have major concern, though. When will girls and women gain the universal respect of being labeled a "hero" instead of the sexist alternative as "heroine?"

    Remember the days when women had to settle for "actress" instead of the broader "actor" that they enjoy today. The same holds true for "stewardess" and "waitress." A man's ego demands the distinction of the inferior.

    The world is slowly waking up to the restrictive use of "for the betterment of man" and "We did this for all mankind." Acknowledging the value of only 50% of the world's population has been trending since the Stone Age, leaving behind the worthless detritus of the talents and skills of billions of women who could have greatly benefited "humankind."

    If you would like to read about a remarkable and compassionate hero, have a look at my new thriller, RESCUE THE INNOCENT. As captain of the world's largest cruise ship, Kathleen Torres faces a torrent of high-stakes challenges while crossing a terrorist-infested Atlantic. She abhors both violence and bullies, but doesn't back down when her 8300 passengers and crew are threatened. Her interiority is in full flower, except when vulnerable with love.

    Best wishes always,

    Christina K. Gross

    1. Thanks! The question came up while I was writing the article about the Heroine's journey. It was fun to explore.

Tagged as:

Subscribe to WITS

Recent Posts

Search

WITS Team

Categories

Archives

Copyright © 2026 Writers In The Storm - All Rights Reserved