We talk a lot about planners versus pantsers versus plantsers but we rarely talk about the process of writing. In the long run, whether you outline or discovery write doesn’t matter. What matters most is getting the words on the page. But how do you do that?
There are folks out there who argue that one shouldn’t question one’s own process. They fear that a close examination of their process will destroy the magic that makes it work. Understanding writing processes, their strengths and weaknesses allows you to adapt your writing process to be what you most need to complete your current work-in-progress. That understanding creates the magic that allows you to do your best work.
If a process is a series of actions that lead to a particular result. In manufacturing, there’s only one way to piece the product together. That linear, assembly line manufacturing process There is no set order of actions that works best for all writers to produce a finished story.
To be clear, this post is about the process the writer uses to put the story on paper or screen and not about the development of said story.
Let’s dive in and explore what these processes are and their pros and cons.
With this process, the writer begins at the beginning of the story and continues with the scene that follows that, followed by the scene that follows, and so on to the end.
Writing out-of-sequence means writing scenes or chapters that you are most compelled to write each writing session, no matter where that scene falls in the story.
These writers prefer to write the last scene first. This may lead to writing the scenes in a reverse chronological order. Some writers jump to the beginning and write chronologically. They can also write the rest of the story out-of-sequence.
The cyclic process for writing is a variation of the linear process in which the writer writes a scene or scenes one day. The following day the writer reviews all or a portion of the previous day’s work, revising as needed, before writing the next scene(s).
With this process, instead of peeling back the layers of an onion, the writer adds layers. The writer writes the first draft as they see or hear the story in their head. For example, it might be only talking heads or only blocks of action. Each of the next few passes adds a bit to the scene, such as location details or emotions or stage business or nuance to the dialogue.
Similar to the Cyclic process, the Edit-as-You-Go process is self-explanatory. Writing and editing occur in the same writing session.
When you start out writing, you may choose a process based on a favored instructor or guru you follow. That’s good for learning, but be flexible. Experiment with the different processes. You can even use a variety of the processes listed here or a variation of one.
Make the best choice for the way you think, and for the story you want to write. If you try something new and you feel discouraged or as if you’re working through the desert, go back to what worked before. There is no right way or wrong way. There is only what works and what doesn't work.
Sometimes it’s not a choice. It’s how your brain works. Sometimes you need to experiment with different processes in order to understand what works best for you. Sometimes, you need to change your process within a novel or for the next novel you write.
The reality of writing is that everything changes. That means you might start with one process and end up with another one or two during a single story or over the course of your career. Understanding which of these processes works best for you and your story will help you do your best work.
What is your writing process? How does it help you produce your stories?
* * * * * *
Lynette M. Burrows is an author, blogger, creativity advocate, and Yorkie wrangler. She survived moving seventeen times between kindergarten and her high school graduation. This alone makes her uniquely qualified to write an adventure or two.
Her Fellowship series tells the story of Miranda, a young woman who dared to break the rules. But in 1961 Fellowship America even the elite can be judged an unbeliever and be hunted by the Angels of Death. Books one and two, My Soul to Keep, and If I Should Die, are available everywhere books are sold online. Book three, And When I Wake, is scheduled to be published in late 2024. Join her newsletter to receive her latest updates.
Lynette lives in the land of OZ. She is a certifiable chocoholic and coffee lover. When she’s not blogging or writing or researching her next book, she avoids housework and plays with her two Yorkshire terriers. You can find Lynette online on Facebook or on her website.
Image created by Lynette M. Burrows via Webtools word cloud generator.
Copyright © 2024 Writers In The Storm - All Rights Reserved
Great post, Lynette! With fiction, I start out with a full outline and then start layering, first with dialogue and movement in a linear movement, skipping over any scene where I am left blank, at the moment. Emotion becomes the second layer.
Interestingly, this psychological paranormal thriller I'm currently writing stumped me once I reached the 75% Major Setback moment, mostly because the villain kept changing.
As a result, I went to the end and started writing backward. In the last scene, the villain revealed themself to me.
I learned a long time ago not to edit as I go because something always changes. No sense in editing before that first draft is completed. Also, I've discovered none of my books are written the same way other than starting with a full outline and writing a fast first draft of dialogue. After that, the book and its characters control the process.
Thank you, Diana. You've given us a perfect example of how switching up your writing process helps you. Congratulations on moving past your block and finishing your draft!
Insightful post, Lynette! Lots of food for thought here.
I’m primarily a linear writer, though, especially with my mysteries, I will jump ahead and write a later scene. For me, mysteries have multiple dimensions—the murder’s story, the victim’s tale, the sleuth’s arc of suspicion, and, since mine are cozies, a cozy dimension.
If a scene stalls out, I’ll make a note and move on. If I realize the novel opened too late in the narrative (as was the case with my current book), I’ll jump back and write a new opening.
I also use bracketed notes for changes or possibly retconning of something in revision. One thing that’s change for me since moving from writing modern-day fantasy novels to cozy mysteries is that editing has become an even larger part of my process, especially given that I’ll sometimes jump ahead, and also because of the nature of a mystery, with clues and red herrings, and character motivation possibly shifting.
I’ve tried cyclic writing but it slows my process to a crawl. I tried it at a writer’s retreat two years ago, and it took me six hours to write a very short story. I followed that by purely pantsing a novelette in the same time. Mind you, I’m normally an outliner, but the energy of linear writing sustained me in that instance.
Thank you, Dale. Love to hear how your process changes as you need for it to. I can see how that works for a mystery writer. Thanks for sharing!
I mainly use the cyclic process. However, I have a very good idea of how the story will end, so I have a clear goal to work toward. I most enjoy the refreshing effect of this cyclic process. I know what I wrote last, how the characters feel, and a knowledge of what challenge they are trying to achieve. Then it is a matter of putting down most logically for the characters.
Thank you for sharing your process, Ken. Knowing the ending is clearly helpful with this process and can speed it up by quite a bit. Knowing your process is half the battle, IMHO. Happy writing!
Thanks for this article, Lynette. It was very timely. My brain isn't working the way it did four or five years ago. I need to find another way to write and finish a story.
Connie, I hear you. Our brains, our lives, our experiences change and that impacts our writing. Don't give up. You'll find your way forward!
I am that died in the wool chronological writer. When I attempted the out of sequence writing and stitching it together, it had all the major scenes but nothing in between that mattered.
As a chronological writer, I get the important stuff down and then layer it since I usually have talking heads and scanty settings.
Editing as I go doesn't work for me since I change things around and delete and add. As a planster, my story changes when I begin to get a better handle on who my characters are, so editing before the story is finished is time wasted for me.
It's good to know what works for you, Barbara. Hopefully it will always work for you. If it doesn't at some future date, keep an open mind and try the other processes again.
I'm linear and edit-as-I-go for the first draft. Then go back in and layer stuff in.
Of course, my critique group points out stuff I missed or wasn't clear or I over explained, typos, plot problems, etc. etc. which means more rewriting.
Sue, no matter which process you use, first drafts are messy. That's why we use critique partners or groups. It sounds like your group is is a good one.
Wonderful, insightful article. Wrapping up my second book, I was frustrated about my output—two books in eight years. I’m 73 now, so very conscious of what time I have left to make any mark. Writing was my boyhood dream career, but not the one I settled into (I wrote very a clever and effective business letters, though 😉). So this year I’ve decided to change how I approach writing.
Mostly, I’ve been editing as I go, but in my second book, which has intertwining plots and an action timeline that must be enforced, I found it necessary to do more plotting. It was difficult, and the cons you mention to editing-as-you-go are spot on. There were many days lost when I had to figure my approach to the next scene. Worse, when longer gaps interceded (I get occasional consulting jobs in my old field), I often came back making some major changes (like changing antagonist and obstacles), changing the narrative direction.
The bottom line is I don’t think I can completely escape the method I’ve used. However, going forward I’m going to experiment with plotting chapters further out. Plus, I’ve decided to work multiple projects simultaneously, so I can switch easy and maintain forward progress.
I’ll know in six months if it’s helped. Time is valuable.
Jerold, hat tip to following your dream. It takes a while to figure out what process or which processes work for you. Hang in there. Every book is its own journey.
My process is the layered approach and it DEFINITELY takes longer. LOL I agree with your analysis! Thanks for sharing this.
I’m also in the land of Oz: this is really interesting as I seem to follow both methods. I’m editing a lot; perhaps better than writing: My Autobiography is close to completion and busy getting feedback. Wits has been a boon to a battle weary wisdom of the elders Sandy. I’ll take your rich advice and keep practicing Mindfulness to get me over the line. A miracle or two would help!!